14 Dec
Posted by SCCM as Concise Critical Appraisal
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the costliest and most common preventable causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this month’s issue of Chest, Kwok Ho and colleagues utilized data from 134 ICUs in Australia and New Zealand to assess the association between omission of early thromboprophylaxis (>24 hours) after ICU admission and mortality.
This retrospective cohort included 175,665 patients. Omission of thromboprophylaxis occurred in 27,890 patients (15.9%), and was associated with an unadjusted mortality of 7.6%. When the investigators adjusted for other covariates with generalized estimating equations and logistic regression, the odds of death was statistically significantly greater for patients who did not have thromboprophylaxis within 24 hours (OR, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.30; P<0.01). An association with greater mortality was found in patients who did not have thromboprophylaxis and had multiple trauma (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.22-2.25), sepsis (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27-1.81), and preexisting metastatic cancer (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.87). Attributable mortality ranged from 3.9% to 15.4%.
This large observational trial demonstrated that omission of early thromboprophylaxis is associated with a statistically significantly higher risk of mortality in ICU patients. As with all observational data sets, residual confounding, and other selection biases, might also explain this association; however, the authors appropriately employed robust statistical techniques to control for differences in baseline characteristics and known confounders. This study adds compelling evidence in support of the recommendation by the National Quality Forum and the Joint Commission International to use thromboprophylaxis in ICU patients as soon as possible after admission.
Concise Critical Appraisal is a regular feature authored by SCCM member Samuel M. Galvagno Jr., DO. Each installment highlights journal articles most relevant to the critical care practitioner.
5 Responses
f.fallahian
December 15th, 2011 at 11:21 pm
1Some times on admission to ICU it takes time to take the permission for start of anticoagulat in an ICH/multiple trauma/GI bleeding case, while the use of pneumatic stockings and limb movement is not suffice. Do you recommend start the anticoagulant irrespective of other physicians involved in treatment of that patient? In SIRS we have coagulation cascade activation concomitantly with inflammatory pathways. Also many subjects I mean young ischemic CVA subjects with within borderline coagulation tests; preotein C,S, antithrombin III, prothrombin polymorphism,homocystein level, negative ANA, ds DNA, VDRL, ANCA,…. still response better to anticoagulant (for example heparin drip, and then warfarin ) and better response for rehabilitation. As thromboelastogram for bleeding diathesis, I think more detailed tests for coaculation/thrombosis affinity should be investigated to decrease the consequences of thrombosis and PTE.
thanks
Catherine Scoon
December 16th, 2011 at 12:16 pm
2When you refer to thromboprophylaxis, are your referring to pharmacologic prophylaxis only, or was mechanical prophylaxis included in this study?
SAM GALVAGNO
January 2nd, 2012 at 12:42 pm
3Catherine,
Great point! The authors considered one of ANY measures to be thromboprophylaxis. So, if elastic stockings or calf pumps were used, this counted as thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis was not defined as simply medications only. I should have made this more clear, because it is important.
Interesting, don’t you think? Another article in the NEJM on LMWH vs. elastic stockings (Kakkar, 2011) showed that the use of enoxaparin plus elastic stockings, compared only with elastic stockings, was NOT associated with a reduction in death!
Thank you for your comment,
SAM
SAM GALVAGNO
January 2nd, 2012 at 12:46 pm
4Dear. Dr. Fallahian,
Indeed, as I practice in a mostly surgical ICU environment, I have to agree with you. Your points are very well taken. Have you seen the latest article on thromboprophylaxis in the NEJM (Kakkar et al., NEJM, 29 Dec 2011)? Elastic stockings with enoxaparin was no better than elastic stockings only. The research on how to best prevent VTE seems to be cloudy sometimes! Your point abotu the thromboelastogram is a great one, and in my hospital, it is a matter of working out the problems inherent with point-of-care testing. I agree with you that tests providing immediate insight into the coagulation status are invaluable from my perspective.
Thank you for providing such a meaningful response!
V/R,
SAM
Allan
January 26th, 2012 at 4:37 pm
5Look nice./
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Author Login
Calendar
Popular Tags
Assessment Bed border course Disaster Dominican Republic experts FCCS FDM Haiti Health Hospital ICU India intensivists intervention ISCCM Jimani McLean Members Miami mortality patients Pediatric PFCCS plan quake Santo Domingo staff Support surgery Team training trials ultrasound Volunteers
SCCM on Twitter
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
© Copyright Society of Critical Care Medicine | Privacy Statement | Terms and Conditions